Gravenberch vs Gibbs-White — FPL Comparison
Midfielder · Liverpool (£5.5m) vs Nott'm Forest (£7.4m) · 2025/26
Head-to-Head Stats
| Gravenberch | Stat | Gibbs-White |
|---|---|---|
| 127 | Total Points | 155 |
| £5.5m | Price | £7.4m |
| 2.0 | Form | 10.0 |
| 4.1 | PPG | 4.7 |
| 4 | Goals | 12 |
| 5 | Assists | 2 |
| 1.66 | xG | 9.36 |
| 2.10 | xA | 2.18 |
| 3.76 | xGI | 11.54 |
| 14 | Bonus | 14 |
| 596 | BPS | 597 |
| 2653 | Minutes | 2811 |
| 4.2% | Ownership | 5.8% |
| 121.6 | ICT Index | 205.1 |
| 9 | Clean Sheets | 9 |
| 3.4 | Avg FDR (next 5) | 3.2 |
Fixture Comparison (Next 5)
Gravenberch (LIV)
CRYMUNCHEAVLBRE
Avg FDR: 3.4
Gibbs-White (NFO)
SUNCHENEWMUNBOU
Avg FDR: 3.2
Value Analysis
Gravenberch
Points per million: 23.1
PPG: 4.1
Price: £5.5m
Season points: 127
Gibbs-White
Points per million: 20.9
PPG: 4.7
Price: £7.4m
Season points: 155
Verdict: Gravenberch or Gibbs-White?
Gibbs-White edges it. With more total points, better recent form, higher xGI, Gibbs-White (155pts, £7.4m) is the stronger pick right now. Gravenberch does have better value for money, but the overall data favours Gibbs-White for the immediate future.
Pick Gravenberch if: you want better value for money and have £5.5m available
Pick Gibbs-White if: you prioritise more total points, better recent form, higher xGI or need to save £-1.9m