Schade vs Gibbs-White — FPL Comparison
Midfielder · Brentford (£7.0m) vs Nott'm Forest (£7.4m) · 2025/26
Head-to-Head Stats
| Schade | Stat | Gibbs-White |
|---|---|---|
| 110 | Total Points | 155 |
| £7.0m | Price | £7.4m |
| 3.7 | Form | 10.0 |
| 3.7 | PPG | 4.7 |
| 7 | Goals | 12 |
| 5 | Assists | 2 |
| 10.96 | xG | 9.36 |
| 2.04 | xA | 2.18 |
| 13.00 | xGI | 11.54 |
| 5 | Bonus | 14 |
| 354 | BPS | 597 |
| 2386 | Minutes | 2811 |
| 1.7% | Ownership | 5.8% |
| 159.5 | ICT Index | 205.1 |
| 10 | Clean Sheets | 9 |
| 3.6 | Avg FDR (next 5) | 3.2 |
Fixture Comparison (Next 5)
Schade (BRE)
MUNWHUMCICRYLIV
Avg FDR: 3.6
Gibbs-White (NFO)
SUNCHENEWMUNBOU
Avg FDR: 3.2
Value Analysis
Schade
Points per million: 15.7
PPG: 3.7
Price: £7.0m
Season points: 110
Gibbs-White
Points per million: 20.9
PPG: 4.7
Price: £7.4m
Season points: 155
Verdict: Schade or Gibbs-White?
Gibbs-White edges it. With more total points, better recent form, easier upcoming fixtures, better value for money, Gibbs-White (155pts, £7.4m) is the stronger pick right now. Schade does have higher xGI, but the overall data favours Gibbs-White for the immediate future.
Pick Schade if: you want higher xGI and have £7.0m available
Pick Gibbs-White if: you prioritise more total points, better recent form, easier upcoming fixtures, better value for money or need to save £-0.4m